Three things and an interesting tidbit
A) Does complaint accurately state all that happened? ("We" don't know yet, since there's been no trial, and the court takes the plaintiff's allegations as true for purposes of a pre-trial motion to dismiss.)
B) Does UVA's action rise to level of a first amendment violation? (Again, we don't know this yet, since no trial, or motion for summary judgment after discovery.)
C) Even if B ends up "no," based on what the trier of fact determines happened, do "we" agree with UVA's actions? (Won't be decided in court; up to the everyone's opinion.)
The tidbit is the case was filed pro se (and P apparently lives in Hawaii now). P now represented by a corporate bankruptcy attorney at a "biglaw" firm in DC. I'm assuming this case was taken pro bono.
[Post edited by UVA_IWU at 04/07/2021 5:49PM]
|
(
In response to this post by Toolie92)
Posted: 04/07/2021 at 5:48PM