The internet home for Hoos anywhere and everywhere.

The Corner

EAPo

Joined: 08/14/1998 Posts: 15775
Likes: 5879


Jacobson is inapposite.. Does not concern experimental/EUA..


.. products/treatments/vaccines. This is an entirely different area of inquiry

Besides, you're now making a completely different argument. You were proposing ignoring the plain language of statute, which is what led to my "change the law if you don't like it" comment.. now you are interpreting case law, an entirely different exercise/dynamic

But, if you want to go there: Jacobson is 1) not statute and 2) does not address the eua fact set.. And to the extent anyone "doesn't like" that decision, the arena to determine whether it DOES apply IS in the courts

It's a completely different scenario/dynamic/paradigm legally-speaking than saying we should "just ignore" statutory language.. Which assertion is what I was responding to

[Post edited by EAPo at 07/09/2021 10:59AM]

(In response to this post by fishhoo)

Posted: 07/09/2021 at 09:19AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  This is just dumb. -- Faz d. Hoo 07/08/2021 9:50PM
  Because it is inapposite ** -- EAPo 07/09/2021 01:13AM
  I am vaxxed and I don't agree with a mandate... -- HiltonHeadHoo 07/08/2021 8:08PM
  Whichever one of you nuked it, I get it. -- hooshouse 07/08/2021 7:27PM
  Kevin Bacon? ** -- Saratoga Hoo 07/08/2021 5:45PM
  All is well! ** -- MBHoo 07/08/2021 7:09PM
  (He requires 7 feet of separation) ** -- BilldaHoo 07/08/2021 6:36PM
  What if? There aren’t! ** -- HoosAC 07/08/2021 9:46PM
  There isn't. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 07/08/2021 8:35PM

Get the Sabre Edge!

Subscribe to TheSabre.com!

UVA Hoops Fans, Check Out Intangible

vm311