The internet home for Hoos anywhere and everywhere.

The Corner


Joined: 03/05/2015 Posts: 14588
Likes: 14342

It is all a transparent dodge of the underlying moral question anyway

The intent is to reframe the argument from:

a) should an adult with no auto-immune disorders, etc. get vaccinated? (HELL YES)

instead to:

b) should gummint mandate a vaccine that is under an EUA? (debatable)

Since he has a hope of rational argument on (b) for at least a little while longer, he wants to substitute that argument whenever there is any threat he might have to debate (a).

But just because the government might not be justified in mandating vaccination in no way makes it morally correct to refuse one if you have no legitimately known health complication like an auto-immune disorder. There are lots of moral wrongs that should not be corrected by force of law, but that does not convert them into moral rights. Its just jerks trying to pretend they are not jerks by arguing they are not criminals.

[Post edited by Toolie92 at 07/09/2021 11:50AM]

(In response to this post by fishhoo)

Posted: 07/09/2021 at 11:49AM


Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:
  This is just dumb. -- Faz d. Hoo 07/08/2021 9:50PM
  Because it is inapposite ** -- EAPo 07/09/2021 01:13AM
  I am vaxxed and I don't agree with a mandate... -- HiltonHeadHoo 07/08/2021 8:08PM
  Whichever one of you nuked it, I get it. -- hooshouse 07/08/2021 7:27PM
  Kevin Bacon? ** -- Saratoga Hoo 07/08/2021 5:45PM
  All is well! ** -- MBHoo 07/08/2021 7:09PM
  (He requires 7 feet of separation) ** -- BilldaHoo 07/08/2021 6:36PM
  What if? There aren’t! ** -- HoosAC 07/08/2021 9:46PM
  There isn't. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 07/08/2021 8:35PM

Get the Sabre Edge!

Subscribe to!

UVA Hoops Fans, Check Out Intangible