The internet home for Hoos anywhere and everywhere.

Virginia Soccer Board

HoosADaddy

Joined: 08/14/1998 Posts: 2456
Likes: 510


Missed the goal live and saw the replay at HT, so didn't see all the angles


The announcers were all absolutely confident that it wasn't offsides. There actually is a very legitimate argument that it was and should've been called:

IF the player in the offsides position is a distraction, he doesn't have to touch it for it to be called offsides. You could certainly argue that Steffen was distracted by the striker -- hence, his hesitation to move, because he expected the player to deflect it. If that player hadn't been there, Steffen absolutely dives and gets that ball - it wasn't that difficult.

I actually think it IS an offsides, for that reason, although not likely to be called without VAR and wouldn't often be called even then. By the laws, it definitely could be, though.

Wahoos1?

(In response to this post by UVa 2002)

Posted: 10/13/2021 at 8:02PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Yikes ** -- UVa 2002 10/13/2021 7:08PM
  Rough start ** -- 4theHOOS 10/13/2021 7:12PM
  Why oh why is Matt Turner not playing? -- RML Hoos 10/13/2021 7:15PM
  I get resting legs, but a keeper? ** -- Wahoos1 10/14/2021 04:16AM
  It already seems like a terrible decision ** -- UVa 2002 10/13/2021 7:19PM

Get the Sabre Edge!

Subscribe to TheSabre.com!

UVA Hoops Fans, Check Out Intangible

vm311